This week,
users of Android phones now have the privilege to install one of the
iPhone's 'killer apps' in the form of Instagram, a relatively simple
photo manipulation tool that turns your pictures into something that
your Granddad or Uncle may have taken back in the 1970s/1980s using an
Instamatic, Box Brownie, or Polaroid camera. Originally, this was an
iPhone only app – but now users of thy holy 'Cult of the Divine
Green Robot' can now join in the fun that was originally the
exclusive club of 'The Jobsian Disciples'.
Needless
to say, this has really pissed a lot of people off who are users of
the divine fruity speaking tube. The interwebs have been set alight
with flame wars, citing that Instagram has now gone to the dogs
because 'The Android Infidels' are messing the place up with poor
quality images and slowing the Instagram servers down with high
levels of traffic generated by the runaway success of the Android
version of the app,
The notion
that Android users have poor quality cameras and mainly use lower to
mid specification handsets is a theory that has more holes than a
warehouse stuffed with Swiss Cheese (and stinks like one too). The
likes of such image improving apps was born from the fact that the
earlier iPhone models before the 4 and 4S had pretty terrible cameras
compared to the competition.
For
example, the 3GS only has a 3 megapixel camera with no flash, while
rival Android models of a similar vintage like the HTC Desire and
Wildfire had 5 megapixel cameras armed with a flash just to name two
examples of older Android handsets. Even something as lowly as a
Samsung Galaxy Mini has a similar specification camera to what the 3GS
has for a mere £80, while another 'low end' phone like the Galaxy
Ace has 5megapixel with flash, ditto the ZTE Blade II. In fact, when
the first iPhone came out the camera on the Nokia N95 was far
superior and kicked it to the kerb in terms of image quality.
So, even
with budget Android handsets like these – they're better than the
iPhone 3GS and cost significantly less. So, boom goes the inane
theory that 'The Android Infidels' are messing their servers up with
poor quality images. Now that we have squashed that myth, lets move
onto comparing the Instagram app, and Vignette.
Instagram:
Since
October 2010, Instagram developed an insane cult following of over
30million users and was one of the most successful apps ever created
for the iOS platform. Obviously, the creators of the app decided that
the coffers had probably peaked and reached a glass ceiling. Rather
than be a one trick pony catering for an exclusively iPhone only app,
the creators decided on creating an Android version which opens the
market up to the lucrative 49% of users they weren't originally
catering for.
In the
space of a few days, it has been a runaway success which will now
multiply the user base exponentially to hundreds of millions of users
worldwide. Which will obviously benefit Messrs Systrom and Krieger,
and their crew of employees aboard SS Instagram Inc no end. Good for
them.
With all
the current 'hoo haa' that's been going on because of this news, I've
decided that I too want a slice of the 'poseur pie' for tasting. To
see what the massive fuss is about these posts I see on social
networking sites; filled with ethereal and nostalgic coloured
pictures of people's pets, trees, breakfast, some girls tits, and God
knows whatever else people want to 'retro-nise' and post for all the
slack jawed social network gawkers to distort and spluff their
trousers over.
I
installed it the previous night, during a point where I got bored of
looking at the PC. After a bit of fiddling, I found that the app had
a somewhat 'Fisher Price' quality and was rather simplistic compared
to Vignette. In fact, it only had something like 18-20 pre-set
effects that had no further scope for fine tuning – but the good
thing about the app is the fact that results can be obtained
instantly whereas Vignette does require the user to work at it; but
the results with Vignette due to the comprehensive options available
can be mind-blowing for the new user.
Assuming
that I probably missed a load of menu's out the previous night, I
tried again during my lunch hour in work to ensure I left no stone
unturned; there definitely weren't any more options to play with. To
be honest, the app is a typical example that follows the minimal
design of Apple software and hardware – to just do something
without too much fuss or worry, and don't sweat over the complex
stuff because we told you to do so – no follow up questions will be
answered. Also, the notion of it being a 'social networking
community' so that you can share your artistic works with utter
randoms is something that doesn't appeal to me. Face it, I have
Facebook, Twitter, a (criminally underused and far superior) Google+
and now I have Tumblr as I wanted to see what the fuss was about with
that. I'll just post my works using those platforms (if I so desired)
and let that be the be all and end all of the matter perhaps; I spend too
much time indoors on PC's cultivating a 'Hackers Tan' as it is, thank
you very much!
In short,
the user base of Android haven't missed anything at all (especially if you're using Vignette); and will probably fail to understand the
fuss like myself who doesn't subscribe to 'The Jobsian Cult'. The
only users it may benefit are probably the ex-iPhone users that migrated to
Android, and had fond memories of using it.
Vignette:
Now, HERE
is the killer app. Vignette is probably one of the best ones that's
worth getting an Android handset for. The features are long and
comprehensive, that cover various aspects of old camera emulation
such as 'Toy Camera', 'SX-70'. Black and White, Sepia, Cross Process,
Tinted Monochrome, Pastel Colours, Lens Flares, Colour Flares,
various grain and frames – pretty much too long to list.
Once you
have sat down with it and had a good look at the settings and
experimented, some amazing results can be achieved. There are two
versions, the free one only shoots in 5 megapixel maximum with some
slight feature limiting, while the full blown version enables you to
use the full megapixel rating of your phone's camera in question.
If you
find the choice bewildering, there's even a random 'lucky bag' option
that picks a combination of random effects so that one picture is
never the same as the next one you take. Like Instagram, an existing
picture can be dragged into the app and altered at will, and you can
save pictures as you go along if you do a particularly nice shot and
wish to keep the original intact. Border and print effects can be
applied too, that turn the image into various retro picture sizes to
emulate a Polaroid with film effects like Portra, Velvia and Ilford
which work very well indeed.
The
pictures posted in this blog speak for themselves, as an A to B
comparison. In fact, if I was an iPhone owner and was showed this app
running on an Android rival owned by a friend I'd be pretty red faced
and embarrassed by my phone – or like some iThing owners argue the
toss quoting a load of bullshit and believing your own lies about
your phone being allegedly superior.
The
£500,000 question is: I wonder if there will be even more of an
outcry if the app was ever created for WinPhone users or Blackberry?
Somehow, I feel that some iPurists out there will now desert the app
and try to find something that's 'iExclusive'; because their fruity
little club has now been 'sullied' by 'The Android Unwashed'. Sad
thing is, many apps have been ported to the Android platform and I
don't recall anybody being so vociferous in the past when this occurred.
The
ultimate bottom line is that Messrs Systrom and Krieger have a
business to run, and to put bread on the table. As a result, it may
come as a shock to iBores that they're not their friends who have
betrayed them by making an Android version – they're out to make
money. I only wished I had the 'Epiphany From The Gods'/'Eureka
Moment' to make hipsters part with their cash for an app that
emulates the results of a camera that you would find in your parents
loft. I might not be into the app that much, but good on them and I
wish the creators well.
I have an iphone and use Instagram. I think the reason I like it isn't the photo-editing ability, it's more the sharing of images with people, I just think of it as Twitter with images. I would point out that there are plenty of iphone apps also (if you can find them through the avalanche of shit on the itunes store - thanks apple) that blow instagram out of the water and take a dump on its face when it comes to editing photos. A lot of people even use these prior to uploading on instagram now.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, as for the flame wars about android users getting instagram - anyone who gets excited about exclusivity is an idiot, instagram is about sharing images. Unfortunately, as with any social media, the majority of people on it are idiots. This is also the case with Twitter, Facebook, MySpace (if it's still alive) that tumblr thing you mentioned (which I still don't understand) the Internet, and the world as a whole. I firmly believe these idiots are everywhere. The only social network to be safe of them is the "sitting on the crapper with headphones on", but even then someone will probably want to scream at you that you have the wrong toilet, that you're listening to the wrong music, and that your shit doesn't stink like it should.
These people are just insecure morons, and whilst I commend your blog for attempting to debunk myths and correct false opinions, I wouldn't bother wasting your time with such people. You can't stop them with reason or logic, they'll stick to their beliefs zealously like a psychotic priest being told his illegitimate son is gay and uses condoms.
Well written rantings as always, and sexy pictures of course ;)
(btw isn't Instagram free? - I certainly don't remember paying for it or seeing ads or anything - though I'm sure having a massive user base is enough for the creators to get cashes)